Page 143 - Reflections on St. Joseph
P. 143

Joseph drew together human work and the mystery of the Redemption.” (Redemptoris Custos, n.
          22)

          In reality, alongside Joseph, Jesus not only learned the trade of His father, but also shared and
          took on that concrete and human dimension which characterizes the world of work, the “civil
          state,  the  social  category,  the  economic  condition,  the  professional  experience,  the  family
          environment and human education.” (Paul VI, Allocuzione of March 19, 1964). The participation
          of Jesus in Joseph’s work thus goes well beyond a mere activity occasionally exercised alongside
          someone else. It is an act of submission, whose meaning qualifies and defines all of Jesus’ life.
          When Luke, after the episode of Jesus being found in the Temple, affirms that He “went with
          them  and  returned  to  Nazareth  and  was  obedient  to  them”  (2,51)  he  does  not,  with  this
          expression,  intend  to  simply  conclude  a  phase  of  Jesus’  earthly  life,  the  preparation  for  his
          public ministry.

          A computer exegesis, ever more fashionable today, searching for how often a word recurs
          in a sacred text so as to infer its importance, might underestimate, due to its frequency, the
          middle participle hypotassomenos, used by Luke to define the entire hidden life of Jesus. The
          Catechism of the Catholic Church interprets this text masterfully: “in the submission of Jesus
          to His mother and legal father, the perfect observance of the 4th Commandment is realized.
          This submission is the image in time of His filial obedience to His Heavenly Father. The
          daily submission of Jesus to Joseph and Mary announced and anticipated the submission
          of Holy Thursday: ‘Not...my will...’(Lk 22,42). The obedience of Christ in His daily hidden
          life already inaugurates the work of restoration of that which the disobedience of Adam
          destroyed.”(n. 532)

          The  Apostolic  Exhortation  Redemptoris  Custos  follows  the  same  lines  of  explanation,
          developing  the  idea  of  “submission”  through  historical  example.  “This  submission”,  the
          obedience of Jesus in the house of Nazareth, is understood to also mean participating in
          Joseph’s  work.  He  who  was  called  the  “son  of  the  carpenter”  learned  his  work  from  his
          reputed  “father”.  If  the  Holy  Family  of  Nazareth,  both  in  the  order  of  salvation  and  of
          holiness, is the example and model for human families, so also, analogously, is the work of
          Jesus at the side of Joseph the carpenter. In our times the Church has underscored this by
          means of the liturgical memorial of St. Joseph the Worker, established on May 1.”(n. 22).
          Thus  due  to  this  necessary  “submission”  in  the  economy  of  salvation,  the  presence  of
          Joseph alongside that of Jesus is not in any way merely decorative.
          In relation to the redemption of work, Joseph is a minister salutis in two ways. The first is
          better known. It views work, as considered by John Paul II as an expression of love, the
          work “by means of which Joseph sought to  assure the wellbeing of  his family.” For  this
          alone Joseph merits mention by the Church in the Eucharistic Sacrifice, alongside that of
          the glorious ever Virgin Mary, because Joseph “nourished He whom the faithful would eat
          as the bread of eternal life.”  (Redemptoris Custos, n. 16, cf. n. 6).

          The second, more closely linked to the work “taken up” by Jesus, consists in the fact that
          precisely  “thanks  to  the  workbench at  which  he exercised  his craft  together  with  Jesus,
          Joseph  drew  together  human  work  and  the  mystery  of  the  Redemption.”(Redemptoris
                                                                                                  119
          Custos n. 22). In this affirmation it is clear, based on the principle that “that which is taken
                                                                 Reflections on st. joseph
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148